(click through for video)

Indigenous Mayan communities in Tojquia use fog-harvesting techniques to wring water out of the air.

Rural communities in Guatemala are using new technologies to wring water out of the air. It is called fog harvesting and it helps to overcome water shortages.

Despite the lush appearances for nearly six months out of the year, Tojquia only gets a tiny amount of rainfall, making it extremely difficult to grow crops and find enough drinking water.

However, that is starting to change for the indigenous Mayan communities in Tojquia who are partnering with a Canadian NGO to try and harvest the fog so that they can have drinking water year round.

This low-tech and affordable technology is now being used in several countries around the world including Chile, Nepal and Yemen. The hope is that it will greatly improve the quality of life for locals and, one day, millions of others.

Al Jazeera’s Rachel Levin travelled to Tojquia to see how it works.


Thanks to these Adlens glasses, people in developing countries can benefit from a luxury we take for granted: prescription glasses. Yes, we may complain about how expensive prescription glasses are, but in other parts of the world, such innovations are prohibitively expensive.

Adlens glasses, however, ingeniously inject water into the lenses in order to create adjustable magnification. At the turn of a knob, Adlens glasses are easily adjusted to individual vision needs. Available at Adaptive Eyewear, hopefully we’ll see more like-minded concepts in other health areas.

Thanks to these Adlens glasses, people in developing countries can benefit from a luxury we take for granted: prescription glasses. Yes, we may complain about how expensive prescription glasses are, but in other parts of the world, such innovations are prohibitively expensive.

Adlens glasses, however, ingeniously inject water into the lenses in order to create adjustable magnification. At the turn of a knob, Adlens glasses are easily adjusted to individual vision needs. Available at Adaptive Eyewear, hopefully we’ll see more like-minded concepts in other health areas.

"Fuck. This is like the same price as regular books. Fuck this thing."

Emily, upon receiving a kindle for a graduation gift and going to make her first purchase.


Change your oil, change the world with Environment Safe, ULTIMATE BIODEGRADABLE* G-OIL® GREEN Motor Oil, the world’s first and only American Petroleum Institute’s (API) “SM” Certified bio-based motor oil. We blend nature’s American grown base oils (domestically sourced beef tallow) with nanotechnology to provide superior performance protection during the maximum oil change intervals recommended by vehicle manufactures while meeting or exceeding requirements.Our bio base-synthetic G-OIL is the GREEN SOLUTION for gasoline engines, providing better protection for automotive engines under the toughest driving conditions NATURALLY BETTER THAN SYNTHETICS.Whether “topping off” or returning your used motor oil to a collection center, G-OIL is compatible with all other motor oils.

So, I learned about G-OIL while I was in Maine and of course after such a drive I’m in need of a change anyway so later this week I’m gonna go pick up some of this stuff. I wonder how prices compare but hardly care—reduced dependency on petrol and reduced waste emissions is worth any price in my book.

Change your oil, change the world with Environment Safe, ULTIMATE BIODEGRADABLE* G-OIL® GREEN Motor Oil, the world’s first and only American Petroleum Institute’s (API) “SM” Certified bio-based motor oil. We blend nature’s American grown base oils (domestically sourced beef tallow) with nanotechnology to provide superior performance protection during the maximum oil change intervals recommended by vehicle manufactures while meeting or exceeding requirements.

Our bio base-synthetic G-OIL is the GREEN SOLUTION for gasoline engines, providing better protection for automotive engines under the toughest driving conditions NATURALLY BETTER THAN SYNTHETICS.

Whether “topping off” or returning your used motor oil to a collection center, G-OIL is compatible with all other motor oils.

So, I learned about G-OIL while I was in Maine and of course after such a drive I’m in need of a change anyway so later this week I’m gonna go pick up some of this stuff. I wonder how prices compare but hardly care—reduced dependency on petrol and reduced waste emissions is worth any price in my book.

“They recalculated the amount of radiation released, but the news is really not talking about this,” he said. “The new calculations show that within the first week of the accident, they released 2.3 times as much radiation as they thought they released in the first 80 days.”

“In reaction to the Fukushima catastrophe, Germany is phasing out all of its nuclear reactors over the next decade. In a referendum vote this Monday, 95 per cent of Italians voted in favor of blocking a nuclear power revival in their country. A recent newspaper poll in Japan shows nearly three-quarters of respondents favour a phase-out of nuclear power in Japan.

Why have alarms not been sounded about radiation exposure in the US?”

"The industrial way of life leads to the industrial way of death. From Shiloh to Dachau, from Antietam to Stalingrad, from Hiroshima to Vietnam and Afghanistan, the great specialty of industry and technology has been the mass production of human corpses."

— Edward Abbey

(Fuente: d-luffy, vía fucknopoverty)

@andyisreadingbooks

If you read the article the very introduction serves to prove the point that artificial intelligence has reached the point in which it is capable of creativity, leading to the assumption that in the near future it will be capable of emotion.
My personal point that life without death is nothing was not meant as an assertion that the pain of death makes life good… by any means.  And death is not always painful, many people die in their sleep never knowing the difference. My claim is that life literally does not exist without death in the same sense that if you had never met heard of Black people you would not recognize yourself as a white person.

As for your personal contentment in middle class life, congratulations… I’m glad you are happy with whatever niche it is you’ve found in society, but you must be able to recognize that the vast majority is not able to find peace in their current positions?  I didn’t intend to imply that this is because not everybody is of the upper-class “doing ground breaking research,”  if you know anything about me (which undertandably, you may not seeing as you’ve only been following me for a couple days) you know that I have no such aspirations.  My personal ideal is a simple life with as much self-sufficiency as possible, taking advantage of local resources and forms of entertainment. So by no means do I “find the idea of working hard distressing in any way.”   I find the idea of work to fatten the pockets of corporate leaders distressing.  I find the idea of doing pointless work for a paycheck to buy things i could produce for myself if I didn’t need to have a job utterly lamentable. (especially in the event that the goods I’m forced to buy exploit laborers in production and waste oil in transportation) and I know many other people feel the same way.

I don’t mean this message to be offensive by any means at all, I’m glad you took the time to add your thought on the subject. I just wanted to clear up some things because I feel like you took my implications the wrong way in virtually every area of this topic. :P

This TIME cover article bothers me in a number of different ways…  The Westerner’s fear of death has gone on too long, and I hope it reverses before it’s too late.  When will we realize that without death, there is no life?  With no contrasting state, life looses all importance.  As if modern society isn’t monotonous enough, with your cubicle work and your commute, and your grocery shopping and what-have-you, can you imagine it going on INDEFINITELY?  Why would we ever want this?  It’s clear to me that most likely WE don’t. Of course they do, everybody that’s aligned to welcome Singularity (the time at which our species will transform into something “unrecognizable” from our current state) is rich and powerful, so of course they’d hop all over the idea of never-ending life so they can rule the earth forever.    You think the people in the middle class are gonna want to go on with their menial labor for corporate gains into infinity? Or is that not the plan, what is the plan?  The article discusses two main components of singularity (bear with me here on how crazy they sound, they aren’t my theories)  A.) superintelligent immortal cyborgs that arise when exponentially increasing technological advancement surpass the human intellectual capacity and so we’re forced to do shit like “scan our consciousnesses into computers and live inside them as software”  (Represented by Raymond Kurzweil)and/or B.) Biological advancements, pursued by people that view death as “an illness like any other, and what do you do with illnesses? You cure them” using primarily telomerase, a process which reverses the depletion or isolated cells. (represented by Aubrey de Gray, whom I watched a TEDTalks lecture by a while back, which you may be interested in.)   So back to my question, what is the plan?  In the event of A, seeing as today not everybody even has access to a computer, how will everybody have access to “superhuman cyborg platforms?”  and in the event of B, not everybody today even has access to the most basic health care, how will they afford telomerase?  The simple answer to both instances: they don’t.   As if class division isn’t extreme enough  today, Singularity supporters are hopeful that by 2045 it will be tremendously worse…  The upper class crust will have the technological and medical capabilities to go on living infinitely while.. what?.. the middle and lower class continue to reproduce and die and live menial, monotonous lives to make the immortal overlords infinitely rich over time?  It’s just fucking absurd. “Kurzweil has…his own approach to life extension, which involves taking up to 200 pills and supplements a day.”
Maybe my analysis to the situation is flawed, and the dystopian future this advancement suggests to me is just my overactive literary mind? If anyone actually made it through reading this far I would love for your feedback because reading and contemplating the article has already consumed my whole morning and I’d like for it to amount to something.  But here’s my closing thoughts;  life extension, and the pursuit of such, is the most innately immoral action that I can think of.  Both for the reason of indiscrepancies that will arise and for the simple fact that “life and death are two sides of the same coin,” without one the other is utterly without purpose.  You can read the article for yourself here, masticate it, get back to me (though I’ll be on Tumblr very little tonight.)
EDIT:
I wish Alan Watts was here to read this article, the dude must be rolling over in his grave.  I have him to thank for much of my capacity to analyze the topic.

This TIME cover article bothers me in a number of different ways…  The Westerner’s fear of death has gone on too long, and I hope it reverses before it’s too late.  When will we realize that without death, there is no life?  With no contrasting state, life looses all importance.  As if modern society isn’t monotonous enough, with your cubicle work and your commute, and your grocery shopping and what-have-you, can you imagine it going on INDEFINITELY?  Why would we ever want this?  It’s clear to me that most likely WE don’t. Of course they do, everybody that’s aligned to welcome Singularity (the time at which our species will transform into something “unrecognizable” from our current state) is rich and powerful, so of course they’d hop all over the idea of never-ending life so they can rule the earth forever.    You think the people in the middle class are gonna want to go on with their menial labor for corporate gains into infinity? Or is that not the plan, what is the plan?  The article discusses two main components of singularity (bear with me here on how crazy they sound, they aren’t my theories)  A.) superintelligent immortal cyborgs that arise when exponentially increasing technological advancement surpass the human intellectual capacity and so we’re forced to do shit like “scan our consciousnesses into computers and live inside them as software”  (Represented by Raymond Kurzweil)and/or B.) Biological advancements, pursued by people that view death as “an illness like any other, and what do you do with illnesses? You cure them” using primarily telomerase, a process which reverses the depletion or isolated cells. (represented by Aubrey de Gray, whom I watched a TEDTalks lecture by a while back, which you may be interested in.)   So back to my question, what is the plan?  In the event of A, seeing as today not everybody even has access to a computer, how will everybody have access to “superhuman cyborg platforms?”  and in the event of B, not everybody today even has access to the most basic health care, how will they afford telomerase?  The simple answer to both instances: they don’t.   As if class division isn’t extreme enough  today, Singularity supporters are hopeful that by 2045 it will be tremendously worse…  The upper class crust will have the technological and medical capabilities to go on living infinitely while.. what?.. the middle and lower class continue to reproduce and die and live menial, monotonous lives to make the immortal overlords infinitely rich over time?  It’s just fucking absurd. “Kurzweil has…his own approach to life extension, which involves taking up to 200 pills and supplements a day.”

Maybe my analysis to the situation is flawed, and the dystopian future this advancement suggests to me is just my overactive literary mind? If anyone actually made it through reading this far I would love for your feedback because reading and contemplating the article has already consumed my whole morning and I’d like for it to amount to something.  But here’s my closing thoughts;  life extension, and the pursuit of such, is the most innately immoral action that I can think of.  Both for the reason of indiscrepancies that will arise and for the simple fact that “life and death are two sides of the same coin,” without one the other is utterly without purpose.  You can read the article for yourself here, masticate it, get back to me (though I’ll be on Tumblr very little tonight.)

EDIT:

I wish Alan Watts was here to read this article, the dude must be rolling over in his grave.  I have him to thank for much of my capacity to analyze the topic.